Re: Theory versus idea

Posted by ggg on December 02, 2003 at 07:29:48:

In Reply to: Theory versus idea posted by davidmac on September 21, 2003 at 04:28:40:

Good description.

.

-==========================

I believe that a major problem exists with many newcomers to this and other forum sites, that problem is understanding the difference between an idea and a theory. The distinction is very simple, if there is a mathematical framework that describes the proposed change to current physical systems then it can be considered a theory, otherwise it is merely an idea and should be proposed as such. It will cause much less trouble for the poster as ideas are attacked much less vigorously because we all have them and appreciate the diversity of them. Theories however, are given rigorous criticism
and you should be aware of that fact when proposing one. You must be able to defend them logically, show how they fit with current experimental evidence and provide mathematical proofs as needed for their defence. I hope this clears things up and provides a better environment for us all.

On a secondary note: The personal attacks that have been occurring on many of the forum pages are totally unnecessary and take much away from the intent of the forum. I for one am no longer going to participate in any such behavior. If we all ignore these attacks and do not respond to them then hopefully they will stop. We (I hope you are all with me on this) will think the better of the person who does not retaliate, and not even pay any heed to what the attack says.


(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :