Re: Strings a minumum topology

Posted by DickT on September 15, 2003 at 11:57:51:

In Reply to: Re: Strings a minumum topology posted by paultrr on September 15, 2003 at 08:01:52:

Paul,

You are absolutely right about instantons not coding a lot of information. A typical partical has a lot more states - ways to wiggle- than an instanton does.

Regards,
Dick


(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Strings a minumum topology -- DickT 9/15/03 (0)
• Re: Strings a minumum topology -- paultrr 9/15/03 (3)
  • Re: Strings a minumum topology -- Mike2 9/17/03 (2)
    • Re: Strings a minumum topology -- DickT 9/17/03 (1)
      • Re: Strings a minumum topology -- Mike2 9/17/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :