| String Theory Discussion Forum |
| [ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ] |
Re: Strings a minumum topologyPosted by paultrr on September 15, 2003 at 08:01:52: In Reply to: Re: Strings a minumum topology posted by DickT on September 15, 2003 at 07:22:39: Yes. In fact, I myself see a difference of sorts between regular manifolds and the Instanton case in general. For one with an Instanton there is no real measurement of time in the classical sence. My own approach to this has simply been to consider them as manifolds of pure quantum, not classical information. Personally this makes the brane the source of everything else, rather were everything else is a projection of that quantum information along holographic ideas. The orbifolds are an interesting issue in topology in general all there own. I sort of recoginze what he was saying about its hard to get a mental image of a lot of this. Part of it depends on you're point of view on weither strings are fundamental or the branes are. The concensus with M-Theory has been the branes are more fundamental. A general treatment of LQFT would tend to support that idea also. So from that perspective then you get involved with the different dimensional branes of which the smallest would be the instanton in general. One interesting aspect I discovered is there are only certain conditions under which, using that frames idea of my own where you can get multiple frames stacked into a singular point or instanton. Those conditions are only actually possible at the start or creation or during say a full scale cosmic collapse cycle if such existed. What I discovered is the instanton state is normally only geared for encoding one particle' state within each instanton. If you try to crame more information in the instanton responds with an equal back pressure. This would tend to imply not only support of the so-called cosmic censureship proposal, but also some speculation that there are no real singularities inside of Blackholes. If that is the case then the event horizon temperature or entropy is vastly lower than the actual center mass temperature which is more akin to that at the earliest moments of creation or what we term unification temperatures and pressure. You end up with a highly confined false vacuum state inside which only remains stable since in our cosmic aspect there is always some influx of particles. In theory, if you were to be able to isolate a blackhole from any other mass or particle influx it would implode and, or,explode exactly like a small version of a Big Bang. I also discovered some support in this that natural wormholes do not occur. If the cosmos is only bounded against itself, using a modified version of Randall-Sundrum type II Models, and not directly against what some call hyperspace, then there is no where for energy to transfer to except on the brane. The branes own rebound effect against compaction tends to, unless engineered around, prevent the formation of wormholes in general. So Hawking and the rest may be correct after all on this.
Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)
|