| String Theory Discussion Forum |
| [ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ] |
A String Is, String DoesPosted by sol on November 23, 2003 at 09:18:32: In Reply to: Alter Strings to a Number Constant Topology. posted by eaglesondouglas on November 22, 2003 at 12:36:49: If it is calculated and we know the energy value, would it not stand to reason, that curvature is implied? Posted by sol on July 01, 2003 at 06:34:40: Einstein recognize some great value in the writings of his 1854 lecture by Rienmann. With Gauss present and at a ripe ole age, it was a leaidng factor and undertanding to me, how such field perspectives are now being engage at the supermetric level and leads to the understanding of supergravity. This link here, becomes a issue about point set topology and here I need some help. I am looking at the those points and how the Fermat principle lead to a diverse movement of strings and knots and we are describing a line that is moving thorugh a complicated field of super metric tensors. Yet it is folowing still the least action principal. The field is very dynamical in understanding the windings of the KK tower. The cylinder as the universe is a extension of Kaluza(circle) and klien here as the cylinder. This is its geometrical consistancy that runs right through to the undertanding of supergravity. I hope I am following the logic right? You can't help but become the theoretical model once you assume the values. This being done,a dynamical world opens up not only in resonances, but in the movement of as well. Sol
Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)
|