String Theory Discussion Forum
[ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ]

Re: Cosmological Space-Time and Global Warming?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supersymmetry IV ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Ramanujan12 on September 26, 2003 at 15:14:15:

In Reply to: Gravity Anomalies posted by sol on September 25, 2003 at 13:26:22:

These are very chalenging questions. First we have the problem of superstring theory, it's covariance, ie. from the requirement to have finer and finer strings to account for the field theory. For now we are talking about the requirements of a space-time symmetry, supersymmetry, and Lorentz quantization, via BRST, which guages the larger strings to the smaller/finer ones. Well as you mentioned, the sun helps us determine the resonance of the solar flares that help us see whats coming and prepare for it. Now the keyword here is resonance. Because the BRST and Lorentz quantizations could have gravitational anomalies ie. field theory constraints (which should be worked out in terms of Dirac re-parametrizations for spins and their orientations.) This resonance could be very important to understand, to understanding the physics from which some of our technology has founded global and cosmological principles. One of which is Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), founded primarily on Dirac spinors and involving liquids bridging anisotropy, isoperimetry and isotropy together. Isotropy on the small scale then must be bridged to the cosmological. However in order for this liquid bridging to have tensor functions (rather than just singular tensors for point particles) and to have space-time and gravitational settings, perhaps the gauge coditions of strings have to be permited in a new way.

Since the tensors for isotropic liquids in spherical NMR describe chemical shifts in terms of phases (phase transitions etc.) the larger-scale supersymmetry for field invariant strings in Dirac methods should be composed in a differentiated space-time gauge. Namely a phase space. However in order to account for gravitational anomolies, and the fact that fields may exist in all space-time symmetries, this finer elemental string has to account for these. But how can it account for them in phase space without first reducing the phase space? Well it can't because it is spherical and strings are circular. It can produce portraits for spining satelites but not these strings. And the fact that once we reduce the phase space we can no longer have Dirac nor Lorentzian quantization (at least for fields whitout a gauge?) This is were these things called cell functions come into play for the space-time tensor modeling of phase space reduction. Perhaps phase space is not the problem, rather it could have to do with the way we reduce it, the tangent plane used to perform such an experiment. Cell functions are highly fine elementals which can be used to produce a kind of lattice-parametrized reuction of phase space and creating a super-interval from which many other things could be explained, such as gravitational anomolies (nuclear gravitational resonance). Since a lattice has coordinate properties as well; as a kind of symmetric parallism to orientational boundaries, unities (spatial filling conditions) and intersective natures,
it thus produces also a new guage. No other elements could be used in phase space to produce this effect except the cell functions, otherwise we could only have singular tensors (non-functional ones for cosmology). We would also be unable to use an algebraic, a Riemannian, or a manifold structure for obvious reasons; we have to use abstract stochastic models that are both interveining (partitional) and tangential (tensor relative). Since phase space is not a differential or algebraic type continuum having ordinary relativity we must barrow elements from it's own field (stochastic "scalar-relative" structures), to produce the proper reduction thus relativizing the continuum. Cell functions however are just the beggining. In order to have spherical considerations for resonances outside this gauge this requires a synthetic differential manifold for a super-tensor (one that is infinitesimal and having absolute smoothness). Topology then is rewritten, without throwing away any variables, from the pre-topology of resonances/scalar fields in the form of a topos (axiomatic topography); that is a new gauge system [inclusive of these global phenomena.]

Ramanujan12

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)


Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:


(The following are optional.)

Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supersymmetry IV ] [ FAQ ]