Re: The Goodness of Mathematical Proof of the Mass of Particle m(p) - Few Given(s) of m(p) is better than Many Givens (e.g. additional given / assumption- m (p) > 0') ?

Posted by kx21 on July 05, 2002 at 21:28:50:

In Reply to: Why you can't assume m(p) > 0 in your posted by DickT on July 05, 2002 at 10:14:43:

The Goodness of Mathematical Proof:-

'Few' givens is better 'Many' Givens...

Copyright 2002 kx21.com


(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: The Goodness of Mathematical Proof of the Mass of Particle m(p) - Few Given(s) of m(p) is better than Many Givens (e.g. additional given / assumption- m (p) > 0') ? -- DickT 7/06/02 (12)
  • Re: m2) Closeness to Truth, Goodness of Mathematics / Mathematical Proof & Complex Givens of SR / GR -- kx21 7/06/02 (11)
    • Lame distraction -- DickT 7/07/02 (3)
      • Re: The Box & Space of SR/GR.... -- kx21 7/08/02 (2)
        • Not the box but your ignorance. -- DickT 7/08/02 (1)
          • Re: m2a) The Beauty of Mathematical Proof -- kx21 7/08/02 (0)
    • Lame distraction -- DickT 7/07/02 (0)
    • Re: m2) Supporting Reference:-Einstein's 'Unfinished' Symphony - Scientific Evidence /proof:: It's easier to unify all the forces without SR & GR -- kx21 7/06/02 (5)
      • The opinion of on ignoramus is worthless -- DickT 7/07/02 (4)
        • Re: Each Link is unique, given Space-time. -- kx21 7/08/02 (3)
          • Unique, and Dumb -- DickT 7/08/02 (2)
            • Re: m2b) M Proof of Uniqueness & M challenge -- kx21 7/08/02 (1)
              • Re: m2b) Corollary: Each Photon is unique & a Salvage for SR/GR -- kx21 7/08/02 (0)

Post a Followup