Re: Question about Paul Dirac(The existance of the Positron)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ String Physics XXII ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by sol on December 18, 2002 at 15:24:19:

In Reply to: Re: Question about Paul Dirac(The existance of the Positron) posted by DickT on December 18, 2002 at 12:24:59:

Dickt,

I realize this is the second time you have said this, and I acknowledge the correction.

I am trying to establish the historical sequence of events, in relation to what we understand of supersymmetry. Is it not a vital aspect of the oscillation? I cannot seem to comprehend, with out it going one way and then another.

How else can these energies be understood, that I venture through the understanding of the path integral as a necessary understanding of the historical evolution. In terms of what has been revealed by Einstein in that Solvay meeting I had mentioned, is the relationship spelled out by Bohr, to what Feynmann might have understood.

The examples given to Bohr, as experiements, tested the validation of the quantum world, that we might have now seen where Feynmann deeply understood the world Einstein already did.

Eisntein would not have been able to come up with the experiments he did without understanding, the intricate relationship of what might have been spooky at a distance?

Feynmann understood the experiemnts and the very ideas of the photon ejection and the hole test, became the understanding of entanglement, and interference. What were Feynmanns words here that if we understand this, we understandthe very ideas of the quantum world?

It is not my intent to rewrite history, but to understand the intricate relatiosnhip that the historical connections might have revealed to us by the contributors figures of the time. The experiments suggested by Einstein to Bohr, which became the work of Bohr to uphold, the very understanding of the quantum world, was a acknowldegement of the preciseness of what Einstein required, of what is held to Truth.

It was understood indeed that such a relationship well concieved, to define the boundaries and edges of, what is understood, must be challenged by experimentation, and all involve understood this.

The basis of string theory for me, is still held in view of what exists at the string level, determines the very nature of curvature. That it happens simulateously in the expression of any energy. E=mc², assured us here of what energy is, in expression.

The geometrical understanding of such expression and dimensional significance, is then understood.