Now behind this post what is valid?

Posted by sol on June 28, 2003 at 06:01:32:

In Reply to: To All- The Fifth Element about Copyright... posted by kx21 on June 28, 2003 at 01:13:14:

Kx21,

Now I have demonstrated what I think of your position here, and after this post, all post that are linked by you beyond this post, are direct interpretations and is a honourable one. I won't counter what is already prescribed in law and what has been instittued in Kx21.com posts as your own, for I recognize the greater interpretaion(law) not kx21's position of .com:)

So in the expressison of probabilties, and the game( what are such probabilties) that any discussion could lead too, or dismiss, the viabiltiy of ideas in expression, as tangible pathways?

The fifth element recognizes the source U(1), and as a viable model and pathway the algorithm, would have automatically acknowledged such a process by participating? It' dimensional significance, in thought and consciousness production( what is experience and what is information)?

Energy speaks to that as well:)

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• M Link speaks:- xyz ~ U(1) -- kx21 6/28/03 (5)
  • How could you put a Box around anything? -- sol 6/28/03 (4)
    • M Physics 21 Link Speaks: Energy = ? -- kx21 6/28/03 (3)
      • U(1) Describes a Probable State, Not which one? -- sol 6/28/03 (2)
        • The Result of U(1) -- sol 6/28/03 (0)
        • M Physics 21 Link: *** Missing Mass ~ 'Genuine' Bubble...*** -- kx21 6/28/03 (0)

Post a Followup