String Theory Discussion Forum
[ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ]

Mandala Models

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Philosphy of Physics XX ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by sol on May 18, 2003 at 15:42:46:

In Reply to: M Physics 21: Core / Basic Principles vs First / Last Principles posted by kx21 on May 18, 2003 at 07:44:59:

Kx21,

Sol said:It is important that what is sought in explanation of Mandalas, is kept in focus, manufacture(Kx21) or otherwise

I should have never used "core" in light of the term manufacture, I might have mixed you up.:)

There are mandalas that we can create, there are mandalas we unconsiously create, and there are models we have created(past life)The shift between this life and the one before, is a recognition of the center, which becomes timeless as far as seeing what that pattern represents, until, that it moves into our awareness. As I had said I had looked at some mandala patterns in book(dream world),and out of these I pulled one in particular.

You have understood the concept of Mandalas as representatives of what nature could have implied of First Principles, a picture in your site, a flower, a lotus, and these you identified as already created. You understand what creation has done in these patterns? You understand growth,and I gave you a tree to compare, from phi. I showed you the Tip of Pascals triangle.

Does your question in light of the "mass confusion" I had given you, warrant saddam's information minister?

Imagine the very nature of what is revealled in consciousness, its beginning, has revealed such a picture to you. That picture, is a holograhical one, in what you see inside(not this one below, but one of your own.:)

If you recognize the mandalas in nature, why have you not recognize them in you?:)

Sol



(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)



Post a Followup


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Philosphy of Physics XX ] [ FAQ ]