your energy equivalence law is bunk

Posted by DickT on August 01, 2002 at 20:42:55:

In Reply to: Re: An Elementary Mathematical Analysis or a Genuine Common Sense: Mass = 0 iff Energy = 0, given that:- posted by kx21 on August 01, 2002 at 19:52:11:

kx21,

Prove it. Do the experiment.

Regards,
Dick

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: m2) The Mathematical Given / Statement, Statement of Physics , MP21 & M Test -- kx21 8/01/02 (0)
• Re: p3) The Mathematical Given / Statement, Statement of Physics & MP21 -- kx21 8/01/02 (18)
  • Re: p3) The Mathematical Given / Statement, Statement of Physics & MP21 -- mad2physicist 8/01/02 (17)
    • Re: p3a v2) The Misfit: The Given- Energy & Mass are equivalent & E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5? -- kx21 8/01/02 (14)
      • Bad arithmetic, why am I not surprised? -- DickT 8/02/02 (3)
        • Re: OOps. misssed out a 'r':- The statement should be generalized / simplified... -- kx21 8/02/02 (2)
          • Yes, true law falsifies false law for p > 0 -- DickT 8/03/02 (1)
            • Re: Yes, true law: Energy & Mass are not equivalent? -- kx21 8/03/02 (0)
      • Re: p3a v2) The Misfit: The Given- Energy & Mass are equivalent & E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5? -- mad2physicist 8/01/02 (9)
        • Energy & Mass are Related By E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5? -- DickT 8/02/02 (7)
          • Re: p3b) Given E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5:- Energy & mass are not equivalent for 'Massless' Cosmic Entities? -- kx21 8/02/02 (6)
            • When E = mc^2 Is Not True -- DickT 8/02/02 (5)
              • Re: M Eureka XVI: SR implied that Energy & Mass are not equivalent, specifically so called 'Massless' Cosmic Entities / Particles by SR, like Photons. -- kx21 8/02/02 (4)
                • Re: M Eureka XVI: SR implied that Energy & Mass are not equivalent, specifically so called 'Massless' Cosmic Entities / Particles by SR, like Photons. -- mad2physicist 8/02/02 (3)
                  • Re: Genuine scientific statement & Emotional response of SR & 'Energy & Mass' -- kx21 8/03/02 (2)
                    • Re: Genuine scientific statement & Emotional response of SR & 'Energy & Mass' -- mad2physicist 8/03/02 (1)
                      • Re Is : "Energy and Mass are RELATED through E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5" valid for Massive Cosmic Entities Logically & Mathematically? given that..... -- kx21 8/03/02 (0)
        • Re: p3b ) ' Energy & Mass are equivalent' is False for the Massless Particles? -- kx21 8/02/02 (0)
    • Re: p3a) The Misfit: The Given- Energy & Mass are equivalent & E=(p^2c^2+m^2c^4)^.5? -- kx21 8/01/02 (1)
      • A little more instruction on SR, maybe this time it will sink in -- DickT 8/02/02 (0)

Post a Followup