Re: The conflict between HUP and GR

Posted by mhelland on September 26, 2003 at 09:33:45:

In Reply to: Re: The conflict between HUP and GR posted by davidmac on September 26, 2003 at 09:22:02:

>Dr. Ameen, your post is probably the most lucid and credible thing that you have said in a long time.

It is difficult to tell, but surely you are joking. Right?

My post puts forth a new theory which presents no new prediction, but does contain all of science's predictions consistently. The ability to describe our currently incosistent theories consistently is of the utmost importance for the credibilitiy of the theories and processes involved.

Dr. Ameen's response to my theory is nothing more than "Yes, but there might be more laws so your theory is not absolute truth!"

This response is equally applicable to every scientific theory ever proposed. Science has never claimed to reach "absoute truth" and therefore the response exposes no contradiction and is void of any valid critisms of the idea that was posted.


(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: The conflict between HUP and GR -- davidmac 9/27/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :