String Theory Discussion Forum
[ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ]

A Very Visual World

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Particle Physics XI ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by sol on July 18, 2002 at 15:42:17:

In Reply to: Re: In Terms,Could it Be Simplified? posted by dr_syed_ameen2000 on July 18, 2002 at 15:06:30:

Dr. Syed Ameen,

All these could be explained in visualizing the role of orbitals of the chemical substances involed in interactions with their distances,planarities,and stereogeometric factors,extending to quantum states interactions of their electromagnetic fields with energies.

I know you have had your disagreements with string theorists and the whole conceptual model. I have come to understand the great value energy places in the phase transitions, as you are describing, and the interlinking capabilities of the matters, to have considered this in a dimensional framework. Yet you resist this idea. Why?

If we accept the graviton as a messsnger, that moves ahead of the photon explusion, where do your ignorons fit in here? You must remember I am new to this world, and the understandings of strings here, to carefully consider, that I move from the basis of what I have understood and could have been scolded for not knowing enough. Thus learning the value of a world I could not see before, I now see movement, where no movement was ever considered.

So from what I have shown, could you carefully interject the idea you have, and its place between the explusion of the photon, and the messenger ahead? What does it do, and is it in context of what you are showing here in your post?
How would it defer from the graviton?

Respectfully,

Sol



(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)



Post a Followup


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Particle Physics XI ] [ FAQ ]