Re: The Tao, what is it?

Posted by sol on September 16, 2003 at 07:39:12:

In Reply to: The Tao, what is it? posted by DocN on September 15, 2003 at 14:40:07:

Thanks Doc for asking these questions. It allows me to focus.

With you and your question held in mind, I like to wait and see what comes of its own, and Lanecove provides the opportunity strange enough:) He is resistant to the idea of topology as a geometry?

Undertanding that, and thnking of the question, it becomes a way in which this information and question connects.

A clearly unbiased state of existance, in the realm of science, is hardly a capable position, when when we refuse to accept that goemetry is explained in topology, and that this is derived from undertanding something about the complexity of points.

So what is the fine balance between dicreteness and continuity?

Is it enough to know Doc that such a point exists in(wave/particle duality)?

Sol


(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• My answer as to "What is Tao?" -- DocN 9/16/03 (8)
  • Doc:) -- sol 9/17/03 (7)
    • Tao is not always Tao -- DocN 9/18/03 (6)
      • Re: Tao is not always Tao -- sol 9/18/03 (5)
        • Re: Tao is not always Tao -- DocN 9/21/03 (4)
          • A Third Possibiity(Apart From Dualism) Was First Choice? -- sol 9/22/03 (3)
            • Re: A Third Possibiity(Apart From Dualism) Was First Choice? -- pelastration 9/22/03 (2)
              • If Mind is the Builder.......what is the result? -- sol 9/22/03 (1)
                • Re: If Mind is the Builder.......what is the result? -- pelastration 9/22/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :