Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan

Posted by sol on September 13, 2003 at 06:37:42:

In Reply to: Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan posted by DickT on September 12, 2003 at 06:55:56:

Dickt,

My son and I have been very busy, putting in a water line to my other property, so I apologize for not being attentive here.

I will list the site, that has put forward this information very soon, so by saying this you know that where I am getting it from, is at least not from the fifth dimenison like Srinivasa Ramanujan was.:)

By saying this, does not diminsh what I have insinuated about prediction. As prediction, I believe is based on the resonant features of things(we use NUMbers), and geometry I feel is included, and why I strive to gain a total view, of geometry. Encapsulate it.

I would like to know further your feeling on what is humanly understood in dimension, and why you feel that what we see around us is all there is? What advantage or disadvantage do you see the idea of dimensions, bringing to the human traits of consciousness that causes you to think it a unnecesssary valuation. I would say please correct me here, as I value your opinion. Even if we might have differences of opinion here, I in no way judge people based on there reasons.

I seem be on a road that seems endless, and wonder sometimes, where it will take me or anyone else for that matter. I do know why(based on belief)we can have previews of the future, and I am trying to explain this with the analogy of the light cone. I do know where this information can be gained and how what needs to be understood for me.

Not that it is necessary, for those who do not care, just that determinism to me, when looked at in the resonant feature of NUMbers, has real psychological effects in consciousness. I know, because I have had many deja vue pictures that have been laid before me, and I don't understand how this was possible. Remember the question on whether math was created or what was natural, there is more to that question that begs for how we need to understand:)

Having the time here, has help me greatly see that the triangle indeed can be Pascals choice of expansions(roads taken), and First Principles, recognizes this underlying factor. Like the Physicist crossing the room, there are core principles that need to be understood by me:)

Yet if you move to the explanation I have, and am giving, it seems the road is taking me( my attempts to expain the fifth dimension) rather then me taking the road:) This would in itself say, then determinism is not possible, yet if we understood the predictve quality, is it not possible to know before hand that actions choosen, NUMbers selected, and beliefs held onto, what ever the reasons, will have dictated the future?

I hope you understand where I am coming from. I want to discuss why you reject the predictive quality of belief?

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- DickT 9/13/03 (8)
  • Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (6)
    • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- DickT 10/03/03 (1)
      • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (0)
    • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (3)
      • Is Mathematics Created or Invented? -- sol 10/03/03 (2)
        • Developing Intuitiveness in Geometry? -- sol 10/03/03 (1)
          • The Shadows of Things -- sol 10/03/03 (0)
  • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- sol 9/14/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :