Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan

Posted by sol on September 11, 2003 at 01:49:35:

In Reply to: Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan posted by DickT on September 10, 2003 at 17:33:59:

Dickt,

You don't have to postulate extra dimension, the depth of the human capabilities is sufficient.

Why was two dimensions added to Ramanugan's modular functions to preserve the symmetry of the string and that these two vibratory modes, can be removed when this symmetry is broken. I do not understand this, could you help elucidate?

As we see, the basis of the Octave(eight) seems to be at the heart of a few systemic functions. The I ching, and it's system of propheticability? NUMbers, that seem to resonant with a future, based on what?

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- DickT 9/14/03 (0)
• Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- DickT 9/11/03 (12)
  • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- sol 9/12/03 (11)
    • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- DickT 9/12/03 (10)
      • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- sol 9/13/03 (9)
        • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- DickT 9/13/03 (8)
          • Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (6)
            • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- DickT 10/03/03 (1)
              • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (0)
            • Re: Category Theory as a Philosphical Tool -- sol 10/03/03 (3)
              • Is Mathematics Created or Invented? -- sol 10/03/03 (2)
                • Developing Intuitiveness in Geometry? -- sol 10/03/03 (1)
                  • The Shadows of Things -- sol 10/03/03 (0)
          • Re: Srinivasa Ramanujan -- sol 9/14/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :