| String Theory Discussion Forum |
| [ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ] |
Re: Heart--"good or evil"?Posted by sol on September 10, 2003 at 11:34:34: In Reply to: Heart-- posted by DocN on September 10, 2003 at 09:42:52: DocN, Our conversations have been quite detailed in regards to emotion, and this is where I come from. What is the instantaeous feature of the limbic system and what does it have to do with consciousness? On the one level we talk about the evolution of the brain and its phyical characteristics, and what leads the way here? Can evolution be changed by what processes we use in our developing minds and bodies? If other things can adapt, can we not, in our will watch the emotive use. What it can do in terms of experience, and what is given to the realm of memory. We know experience can be sealed in terms of its emotive values, and how far back can you remember? Are there better times in which your mind is capable then others? Meditative uses, and the noise, can you not delve deeper? The heart to me sits dead center of what we are capable of doing in terms of the lower centers(the square) and what can be moved to the head(higher three). Imagine, the heart being determined in the head? What does that mean? If experience can seal memory, and emotions are what give substance to memories, then what value is the brain in this cycle if it can watch what it remembers? In Lama Govindas book, which I am having trouble remembering,(imagine:) he detailed as a art process that incorporates what is the moved from the lower center to the triangle. From the square (matter) to triangle (thought) In this context density of vinrations is then raised here in what is held in thought, and imagine the triangle as a varying density of vibrations, where it is most dense at the peak. If matter was associated at the peak what would matter be like at the base? What would the density of vibrations be at the base? If you knew then, what the heart was capable of, would you not say that you now can overlook what is inherent in your body and mind, that if you choose experience, what kind of experience would you choose for your life? Polarity, would have been determnined in the heart? To remain based in our lower emotive states, or, to transcended experience with aspirations for a return too....? The weight of what is apparent to me in truths then, is weight, and with the feather, and we know how light that is:)If you were to compare density of vibration with the feather, what would you have relegated to the truths that you have lived? We know these will be in the hands of each of us to decide, and will be our scale, with which we measure. Spiritually, how would you know if you have progressed? You will have a answer for your own self eventually?:) Sorry for being so mystic about it, but its like taking on models and paradigms. You tend to see differently, once it has become part of you. Belief is like that. It is a envelope of who you are and all things come appropriately. "Now," is a future determinante? Some do not believe in determinism, but I do, and I accept full responsibility for my actions. What might I do diffeent next time? Sol
Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)
|