Re: Validation

Posted by sol on September 25, 19101 at 03:57:21:

In Reply to: Re: Validation posted by sol on September 23, 19101 at 14:30:31:

Validation would come from the ability to reproduce. This is understood. But what if you are presented with something that has defied gravity, and you know it was within the human capability and means of individuals and individual.

I have seen such a demonstration, and know full well, the responsibilities I have in which to offer such demonstration, and yet, in not having done so, would I relegate such experience to fallacies of the mind?

Fact is human perception cannnot be ruled out, and the odd incidents of nature that happen, cannot be ignored , even in face of the demands, so lets say the subjective reality here of belief is supported by experience, yet has not been tested to a rigourous standard. All could choose to relegate to nonsense?

The fact remains, that belief formed is based on experience, and who could say I was wrong?

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Validation -- DickT 9/25/101 (7)
  • Re: Validation -- sol 9/25/101 (6)
    • Re: Validation -- DickT 9/26/101 (4)
      • Re: Validation -- sol 9/26/101 (3)
        • Re: Validation -- DickT 9/26/101 (2)
          • Re: Validation and the New Ball Game -- sol 9/27/101 (1)
            • Re: Validation and the New Ball Game -- DickT 10/04/101 (0)
    • Re: Validation -- sol 9/26/101 (0)

Post a Followup