Discrete versus Continuity?

Posted by sol on September 16, 2003 at 07:08:24:

In Reply to: solar wind, heliosphere, plasmas, etc posted by lanecove on September 16, 2003 at 05:13:00:

Lanecove,

Hopefully my post does not dissappear?:)

Sadly, no need for strings, branes, extra dimensions, holons, axions, WIMPS, even neutrinos; it's just boring plasma physics.

Think of the differences in the number of points in a area and the complexity of them. In zerpoint, we understand indeed, to look at the nature of particles in a different way? Continuity of movement is the question of the energy in particles and their interactions, and this can not be done ,if we have matter defined states like we normally think of them.

Now what I am thinking is not just some fancy illusion I wish to remain free and happy with:)But we have to define this movement in some way? Entrophy maybe, and how geometrically would you define that kind of movement if we refer to it in the way I have just said(discrete forms in mater states), compared to the zeropoint consideration each particle state has been identified in?

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Discrete versus Continuity? -- lanecove 9/16/03 (0)
• Geometry is Better then Topology? -- sol 9/16/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :