Quark to Quark Measure

Posted by sol on September 15, 2003 at 10:31:48:

In Reply to: Re: Could the 'missing dimensions' be quarks? posted by DickT on September 15, 2003 at 07:05:03:

Dickt,

He rejected the idea that there was an "underlying manifold" on which the metric and curvature was defined.

I would need some correction here.

The "geometries," are all inclusive of these definitions of weak force to plasma consideration in the undertanding to supergravity(topologies)?

First in the undertanding of the "analogies" of the metric function( have given repeated examples) and the strings tension. The greater the distance, the more energy is involved( the greater the grvaitational field). This was a ole view, with which you had said, required new perspectives?

This post was a moment for reflection for me. Quark to Quark Measure There is another post with which we discussed this directly. I am looking for it.

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Quark to Quark Measure -- DickT 9/15/03 (2)
  • Re: Quark to Quark Measure -- sol 9/15/03 (1)
    • Re: Quark to Quark Measure -- DickT 9/15/03 (0)
• Dimension is Relative to Energy -- sol 9/15/03 (14)
  • Re: Dimension is Relative to Energy -- DickT 9/15/03 (13)
    • Dimension is Relative to Metric Points:) -- sol 9/15/03 (12)
      • Re: Dimension is Relative to Metric Points:) -- DickT 9/15/03 (9)
        • solar wind, heliosphere, plasmas, etc -- lanecove 9/16/03 (8)
          • Re: solar wind, heliosphere, plasmas, etc -- rtharbaugh 9/16/03 (4)
            • X-rays from the dark side of the Moon -- lanecove 9/17/03 (2)
              • X-rays from the dark side of consciousness -- rtharbaugh 9/17/03 (1)
                • Re: X-rays from the dark side of consciousness -- lanecove 9/17/03 (0)
            • here is the link -- rtharbaugh 9/16/03 (0)
          • Discrete versus Continuity? -- sol 9/16/03 (2)
            • Re: Discrete versus Continuity? -- lanecove 9/16/03 (0)
            • Geometry is Better then Topology? -- sol 9/16/03 (0)
      • Gmn = - 8pG/c2Tmn(From Gravity to supergravity) -- sol 9/15/03 (1)
        • Re: Gmn = - 8pG/c2Tmn(From Gravity to supergravity) -- DickT 9/15/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :