| String Theory Discussion Forum |
| [ String Theory Home ] [ Forum Index ] |
Re: Shape of SpacePosted by sol on April 26, 2003 at 03:57:14: In Reply to: Re: Shape of Space posted by pianowow on April 26, 2003 at 01:01:51: Movement has to be described somehow? Without these references(Rth's instead of using a triangle for a reference, he speaks to this movement in a different way), the understanding of solids things, was easily interpreted(box)? When you move over to non euclidean distinctions, the view has to change as well. Instead of looking at discrete objects, the energy has to be understood, the resonances have to be understood, and how did we get to such a discrete thing? C read my view of space very easily. Yet have the dynamics been revealed? I understand the duality very well for me to speak to Einseins basis and equation. The brane developement idea, is specific to dimensional interpretation, and we give the string a one dimensional feature, yet we moved to a brane( a three dimensinal feature)? We still use this process as a basis much like Einstein did, and it had to have some geometrical understanding for it to lead him through to the Riemann sphere. What is a string? And we are lead through this geometrical understanding? Now at the brane, such a evolution incurrs Einsteins developmental model? All of it contained in the movement and we are talking about physics here:) Now that C has concluded: In any octave, how is energy injected into that system? These are very old ideas, based on, where and how these enegies are injected. Between Mi and Fa? What does this spiritual amd philopohical system have to do with you or I? What does it have to do with movement? It explains the movement, on a lot of levels and scale? I may give you the structure of the proton but as a universe how complex is the rotations to have said that this too can exist in the measure of the universe? Scale is a interesting application, but you have to understand that such resonances can set up, and sympathetic vibrations rings, the same toones in other things as well. How are such systems within systems spoken too? Sol
Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)
|