Re: Strings and Information

Posted by sol on September 08, 2003 at 13:33:29:

In Reply to: Re: Strings and Information posted by lanecove on September 08, 2003 at 10:04:07:

Lanecove,

Dickt's comment in regards to the Higg's field

Big Bang, unification at such levels, and why is there not unification in our thought constructions?

If a physicist crosses the room? Click on Cartoon

From gravity to supergravity.

We understand the complexity of gravity, and we undertand how complex it can become. What is the dimensional significance of this in our talks? What is the relevance of scale here? Table top experiments? Distance? Length? Metric functions and the analogies(quark to quark measure)?

The determination for me, is how we use energy even at the scale we do, and in the world reality the weakness of the measure of gravity, and there is a direct correlation to energy at both the high energy levels and the low?

Scale has to be a factor here in order for us to understand how we move from euclidean geometries, very weak, to the higher geometires(plasma) very strong.

I am definitily open to corrections here, as I would like to push forward. The string's length and the measure of distance is very important in my developing understanding, as it represents not only the strong measure of planck length,but also the weak measure.

In this respect to have unified the strong with the weak there would then be consistancy in thought construction because this then becomes a viable model for consciousness?

You see?

Sol

(Report this post to the moderator)

Follow Ups: (Reload page to see most recent)

• Re: Strings and Information -- lanecove 9/14/03 (1)
  • Re: Strings and Information -- DickT 9/14/03 (0)
• Steering Behavior -- sol 9/08/03 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    :     (Save your login cookie)
Password  :     (Delete your login cookie)
Subject : 

Comments:

(The following are optional.)
Link URL   : 
Link Title : 
Image URL  :